Link to homepage •  Home   • Search   • Site Map   


The ATV
Connection Big
Utility Machine
Shoot-Out.

Multi-Seat Cargo Units.
 undefined

 
Ergonomics/Cargo Bed 

     The Mule made the best of show, truly an ergonomic dream. When a rider climbs into the cockpit every control is in easy reach. The comfortable bench seat allows for easy entry and exit, foot controls are placed just right. Operating controls such as the gear selector, differential lock and 4-wheel drive selector are within easy reach. Headlights, temperature and neutral selector are lighted for ease of use. We loved the dash mounted 12-volt power inlet and dash mounted hand choke. Other features include large glove box, open driver side storage compartment, horn, hour meter, key start, hood latch and the best, under hood dry storage compartment we have ever seen. Lastly, the dash has a brake fluid site glass opening put in the driver’s easy view. The emergency brake is hand operated and undefinedplaced near the drivers left knee, just below the passenger’s leg is the 5.3-gallon fuel tank with easy to read gas gauge. The Mule is built tough, a full steel floorboard, tube steel hip restraints and a full steel roll cage. We also liked the fact that the seat could be rotated up to check the fluids and the air cleaner.      This all sounds impressive enough; but, there’s more! The 3010 features a tilting steel cargo bed; and although the bed is steel, the noise level is none existent. The bed is clamped down on each side with two heavy-duty latches. With a dry weight of 1,278 pounds, the Mule has a towing capacity of almost the same,(1,200pounds. The cargo bed has a load capacity of 803 pounds and a total load capacity of 1,330 pounds. The mule proved to be a real “mule.”


undefinedNow for the Ranger’s ergonomics; this is not the Rangers strong point. Don’t get us wrong, the Ranger has all the necessary controls perfectly placed for the driver’s convenience. The Ranger 4x4 is a basic ergonomic package with no extra convenient storage areas. The dash consists of a well placed steering wheel, differential lock control, gear selector with lighted indicator, illuminated push button 4-wheel drive, pull choke, hour meter, turn key start, illuminated light switch, drink holder and 12 volt inlet. Not bad for the basic package. We were a bit disappointed that Polaris didn’t realize they could have used the front under hood area better. As of now, the Ranger’s front under hood holds the air inlets to the engine and transmission; but, we would have really liked a compartment for dry storage. Another feature that we really were not to fond of was the emergency brake; it’s not that the brake did not hold well or that it was not dependable. The problem was the more of an ergonomic factor; the foot-activated emergency brake was located in the middle of the footing area, just to the right of the gas pedal. This made using the brake a bit uncomfortable; it would have been easier for a center passenger to apply the E-brake. Lastly, the under dash E-brake release, typically let the user wondering if there could have been a better way of releasing the foot brake. We all want a comfortable feel in undefinedthe cockpit and that’s what the Ranger does have, a superior seat, and head rests, steel tube hip restraints and a exceptional enclosed footing area. The comfort does not stop there, a cab like roll cage protects the riders. Two grab handles are conveniently located inside the roll cage. The only downfall to the roll-over protection are the annoying squeaks that occur from the center joints. How about the superior fuel capacity, 8 gals of fuel located under the seat and supplied with a gauge. The Ranger excels in the work area, large loads are pure adrenaline for this machine. How about a load capacity of 1,500 pounds, that’s 350 pounds more than the unit weighs. As if that’s not impressive enough, how about a cargo box capacity of 1,000 pounds and a towing capacity of 1,500 pounds. The cargo box is very tough, a heavy-duty plastic utility box. The double walled cargo box only complemented the work ethic of the already unstoppable Ranger.


The Twister’s ergonomic standpoint is plain and simple, all the basics in easy reach of the driver. We found ease of entry and comfortable seating with hip guards and grab rails that make the grade. Ample leg room and a well-designed steering wheel provide the driver with an above average cockpit. Dash controls were as follows, easy to reach headlight switch, turnkey starting, hour meter, 12-volt power point and low oil indicator light. The gear selector was situated between the seats and offered forward,undefined reverse and neutral. Both the gas pedal and brake were sufficient, the foot brake doubled as an emergency brake with golf cart style E-brake, just tap to release. The Twister supplies a passenger side glove box and under seat storage, plenty of room for the odds and ends. A 7-gallon fuel tank with gauge gives plenty of time between fill-ups. We liked the beefy push guard and double walled plastic cargo box; quiet and tough best describe the large cargo box. We loaded the cargo box of each unit and each handled the loads with ease, the Twister had a lower box height making loading and unloading much easier.
 
Traction/Stability

     The Mule is put together with the rancher, farmer, hunter and basic worker in mind; anyone can use the MSC unit in any undefinedsituation, at anytime and without any worry. We used the Mule in many situations, testing the traction in mud and on hills was a priority. Traction starts with the tires and the 3010 uses aggressive 23x11-10 tubeless tires. The Mule’s traction does not come from raw mud slinging power but from good, low gear grunt; and like a willies jeep, the positive traction is very effective. Trail rides in the Mule were very effective in deciding how much traction the machine truly had, obstacles such as downed logs and off cambers can complete the evaluation. With each mile our confidence grew, the Mule would climb over rocks and logs with out a problem. We did find that off camber situations could cause the suspension travel to limit itself out; and that combined with the stiff chassis, could cause one wheel to leave traction. Not a big problem but it is factor in our test. Problems can occur and one of the worst places for an unpredictable occurrence is whenundefined climbing an incline. From our experiences with the Mule that should never be a problem, the unit’s up-hill predictability was very comforting.      In a situation where we are testing machines that weigh much more than the rider, we worry about rollovers. This prompted us to check the point at which a side rollover would occur. We had never done this test before, but we’re sure you’ll see it again. The Kawasaki Mule 3010 scored second best with a point of rollover reaching 28°  this was surely past the safety point but we thought you would like to know.
 
The best way to describe the Ranger’s traction would be awesome, hole-shot, hook-up, power-sliding grip! A just right undefinedcombination of tires (25x10-12 front, 25x11-12rear), suspension and 4-wheel drive with differential lock put the Ranger in a top contender position. We found ourselves playing in our test hole, nothing could stop the Ranger. Mud would be thrown from each tire, it was hard not to keep a heavy foot on the gas. If there was ever an All Terrain Sport Utility Vehicle (ATSUV) this was it. Common trail riding was a joy in the Ranger, encountering logs or rocks would raise the fun factor. When a log blocked the trail, the Ranger would just roll over the obstacle with plenty of obstacle absorbing traction. On several occasions we found ourselves in a tight spot, realizing the Ranger was not a small vehicle. As with any trail ride, we would look to find the best way to cross trail hazards; on one occasion, a large rock pile was the only way around a downed tree. The combination of traction, groundundefined clearance and the superior skid plate made the rock hazard history. The wooded mountains of Pennsylvania are dotted with deep hollows and rising mountain passes, there are a few hill climbs. Again, the Ranger negotiated inclines with out a resistance. A suburb all-around trail machine. If we could not make a trail hazard the first time, all it would take is a quick reverse and try again. Usually all we needed was a little momentum to power over obstacles. After days on the trail we were still finding it hard to complain about the Ranger, our last test did give us something to pick on. Realize the Ranger has very good ground clearance, 7 inches. A factor in our rollover point test, the test unit came in last of all the units with a pivoting point of 23°. Again this is just a test not a safe angle point.
 
 
2002 Multi Seat Cargo Units Shootout
2002 Multi Seat Cargo Units Shootout Page Two
2002 Multi Seat Caro Units Shootout Page Three



 
 
 
SPONSORED AD
SPONSORED AD
 

© 2007 ATV Connection Magazine. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited.
 
 
Forum Archives